Why the public rejected the Bollywood Epic Adipurush

Why the public rejected the Bollywood Epic Adipurush

Adipurush, an extravagant and much-hyped Indian movie, has experienced a box office meltdown as a result of outrage from viewers and reviewers. Meryl Sebastian of the BBC examines the film’s problems.

Adipurush had all the makings of a big-budget hit: a star with a sizable fan base, a plot based on a beloved Hindu epic, a sizable budget, and even the support of a few BJP figures in power. It was the most recent in a string of films that claimed some affinity with nationalism or Hinduism, or sometimes both. The strategy worked for some people, but it backfired for Adipurush since the audience it was made to delight and pleasure has turned against it.

Adipurush’s creators tell the public that the film is inspired by the Hindu epic story Ramayana. The Ramayana tells of the Hindu hero Ram’s victory against the demon ruler Ravana after the latter kidnaps his wife, Sita.

Upon its first release, the picture received virtually universally negative reviews. Opposition lawmakers criticized the film, and two cities in neighboring Nepal prohibited any Bollywood films unless an “objectionable” portion was deleted.

Nepal bans Bollywood films due to dialogue.
The ultimate blow came in the shape of an audience outcry that surprised even the creators. Protests were conducted in many regions of India, and some Hindu organizations requested that the film be banned. Adipurush’s director Om Raut, and writer Manoj Muntashir have received death threats and are presently under police protection.

Adipurush is one of a flurry of new films intended for Hindu viewers, according to critics. Some have also been accused of encouraging religious conflict. Both The Kashmir Files and The Kerala Story were big office hits despite being harshly chastised for distorting facts and inciting Islamophobia. Some have also attacked the film’s depiction of Ravana, who is a devotee of the Hindu deity Shiva, a talented musician, and a powerful ruler.

The film was anticipated to meet up to the high standards set by blockbusters like SS Rajamouli’s RRR and Baahubali, as well as Mani Ratnam’s Ponniyin Selvan, which stood out for their intriguing plots, beautifully handled language, magnificent set pieces, and adequate visual effects.

On the other hand, Adipurush looks like a school play with low-grade acting and meme-friendly CGI, according to reviewers. They’ve mocked it for having a “video game” atmosphere, “clunky graphics,” a lack of imagination, allusions to Western fantasies like Lord of the Rings and Game of Thrones, and a two-dimensional storyline.

Audiences were outraged by its discourse, with many claiming that the use of common language was demeaning to the deities it depicted. They also criticized the picture of Ram, whom followers think looks like “Maryyada Purushotam” or “the ideal men,” as an angry god.

The film’s box receipts dropped following its initial weekend, surprising even industry observers. The Hindi version of the film alone was expected to collect at least 2 billion rupees in its first week after release, despite being made on a budget of about 5 billion rupees. According to an expert, this will now end at round around 1.34 billion rupees.

The film has seen a massive drop in collections for its Hindi version only since Monday.
In India, the Hindu epic is provoking a political uproar.
The anger and fury disrupt be fueled by Hindu organizations and societies who have called for the film to be banned.

The top priest of the Ram shrine in Ayodhya, considered to be Ram’s birthplace, claimed the talks made his “blood boil.” The Hindu Mahasabha filed a police report in response to the film’s “wrong” costumes, visuals, and wording. According to the All Indian Cine Workers Association, the film offended Hindus.

While there are various versions of the Ramayana throughout Southeast Asia, Valmiki’s Sanskrit poetry is the most influential in India. Adipurush begins with a long disclaimer that this is an adaptation of the original.

One of the most prominent versions of the epic is a 1987 television show that writer and novelist Dilip Mandal thinks became the definitive rendition of Valmiki’s epic. People in India have grown up witnessing renditions of the epic as plays presented in schools and festivals, enhanced with regional music and expressions. Writer Manoj Muntashir explained his creative selections in Adipurush by saying that he wrote the film in the narrative tradition he grew up hearing in his Uttar Pradesh village.

She labels it a “lazy film that doesn’t bother to delve into the richness of the epic” or grasp the impact it has on people because of its “terrible dialogues and shoddy world-building.” However, the reviewer of the film Rahul Desai thinks that the reasons behind the rejection of the film are as concerning and problematic as the film itself. “There is no defending the film,” he told the BBC, “which appears to scale up the aggressive language of modern Hindu nationalism.” However, the thing is that most of the people are offended because they can’t stand the amendment of tradition.”

“We’ve gotten to the point where Hindu mythology (like the Ramayana and Mahabharata) can’t be touched,” he adds. “Unlike historicals, where facts are regularly altered to suit hate-spreading political narratives, people see it as an attack on their truth.” This is why, he claims, even a hint of newness in the picture gets criticized.

“It is undeniable that a sizable proportion of the Indian public now believes in Hindutva themes. “However, they also go to the theatre to be entertained and to get their money’s worth.

%d bloggers like this: